The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing
The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual duration of service nearly violates all the service composition for a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention of the legislation nor of the equity. Read more
Stacy, a tenant inside a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not offered her enough notice before raising her rent, citing a completely new state law that demands a minimum of ninety days’ notice. Martin argues that the new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring on exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it's generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.
The regulation as proven in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be effectively-settled that while contemplating the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to take into account the merit of the many qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who're found for being most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked by the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of your respondent department.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it ideal on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision of your Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions more info will be the opinions that are filed over the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[four]
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the figured out counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.